Price of Politics
Letter to the editor
Re "Political money talks - but gagging it could be worse," March 26: I was surprised to read the column by Dan Walters concerning a bill by Assemblywoman Loni Hancock proposing California clean money campaign legislation. I would like to believe that not all of our political representatives are corrupt, but there is no doubt in my mind that millions of dollars of special interest contributions have given us a corrupt government and is the major reason we are in a massive financial mess.
Our new governor said it right: "Money comes in, favors go out, the people lose."
Walters also neglected to state clean money laws have been very successful in Maine and Arizona. Clean money is optional for candidates.
If we want government to represent us, we need public financing. If not, we know who their constituents really are. Either way, citizens pay. Walters' solution would only bring us more corruption.
- Fred Winn, Placerville
See the article on Sacramento Bee website
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)
Californians need to know who's paying for politics
San Gabriel Valley Tribune, by Letter to the Editor, 5/22/13
"Political ads are self-serving, but many of them don't even tell us who the "self" is... SB 52 would change that..." Full story
Letters: The Politics of Corporations
Los Angeles Times, by John M. Goodman, 5/9/13
What is little known about the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision is that eight of the nine justices also said that disclosure of who is paying for ads is really important — first, so voters can properly weigh the arguments; second, so shareholders can know how their companies are spending their money . . . Full story
