PPIC poll: Californians rejecting ballot measures
All would fail if election were held now, voter interest increases
Surging voter interest in the Nov. 8 special election could test the low-turnout predictions of many political pundits, according to a new survey released Friday by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC).
But greater voter attention does not translate into increased support for specific ballot measures or for the man who called the election in the first place, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Although most likely voters continue to question the wisdom of the special election â€" 54 percent call it a bad idea â€" they are nonetheless showing more interest in and awareness of it. Eighty-one percent of likely voters say they are closely or somewhat closely following news about the special election, compared to 69 percent in September.
â€œThis level of interest is similar to what we observed during the 2002 gubernatorial election, which had a 51 percent voter turnout,â€ says PPIC survey director Mark Baldassare.
Voters also appear to be more aware of the specific measures on the November ballot. When asked which initiative interests them the most, a majority of voters are able to name a specific measure, with Proposition 75 (18 percent) and Proposition 74 (15 percent) leading the pack. Last month, votersâ€™ top response was donâ€™t know (38 percent) or none (12 percent). One reason for the increased awareness? Advertising. Eighty-three percent of likely voters say they have seen television advertising about ballot measures.
However, greater awareness has failed to sway public opinion when it comes to specific ballot measures. Indeed, only one measure (Proposition 75) has seen significant movement since August â€" in a downward direction.
None of the measures actively supported by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger currently enjoys majority support, even when the likely voter pool is limited to a subset of voters who are particularly engaged in the special election, the PPIC poll says.
â€¢ Teacher tenure (Proposition 74)
â€" Likely votersâ€™ support
for this measure â€" which would increase
probationary periods for public school teachers
â€" stayed relatively steady during the last
month, rising from 43 percent in September to 46 percent
today. Among special election voters, 46 percent say they
support the measure while 49 percent oppose it. A majority
of likely voters (55 percent) say the outcome of this
proposition is very important for improving teacher quality
in Californiaâ€™s public schools.
Ratings for State Officials Remain Low
Despite the fact that his special election appears to have galvanized voters, Mr. Schwarzeneggerâ€™s approval ratings remain at a low point. Currently, 33 percent of Californians approve and 58 percent disapprove of the way Mr. Schwarzenegger is handling his job as governor. Likely voters are slightly more positive about the governor than are Californians generally: 38 percent approve of his performance in office, while 57 percent disapprove. Fifty-seven percent of state residents and 56 percent of likely voters also disapprove of his handling of government reform. And far more residents today (39 percent) than one year ago (17 percent) describe the governorâ€™s time in office as worse than they expected.
The state legislature also remains in negative territory, with 56 percent of Californians and 65 percent of likely voters disapproving of its performance. When asked about the job performance of legislators from their own districts, residents are more positive: 38 percent approve and 39 percent disapprove of their legislatorsâ€™ performance in office. However, these ratings have declined sharply from one year ago (49 percent approve, 31 percent disapprove).
Given these less-than-flattering assessments, PPIC says, it is not surprising that a majority of Californians (57 percent) believe term limits have been a good thing for the state and are opposed to term limit reform. Specifically, 62 percent of state residents oppose the idea of allowing legislators to serve up to 14 years in either the assembly or senate, rather than requiring them to split their time between the two houses.
Initiative Process: Californians Ready for Reform?
Californians are big believers in the initiative process, but many also think the system has flaws and could use reform, according to the survey.
What are they willing to do to improve the initiative review process? Strong majorities of likely voters support changing the current initiative process to allow for a period of time in which the initiative sponsor and the legislature could meet to attempt to forge a compromise (77 percent) and having a system of review and revision of proposed initiatives to avoid legal and drafting errors before initiatives go to the ballot (73 percent).
One review reform California voters wonâ€™t accept? Only 37 percent favor â€" and 57 percent oppose â€" allowing the legislature and governor to amend initiatives after they are passed by voters.
In the context of a special election where millions of dollars are being spent on initiative campaigns, an overwhelming majority of voters (82 percent) favor increasing public disclosure of funding sources for initiative campaign and signature gathering efforts. Other campaign-related reforms fare less well: A majority of likely voters (52 percent) oppose increasing the number of signatures required to qualify an initiative for the ballot, while likely voters are divided about increasing the amount of time during which a sponsor may gather signatures (46 percent favor, 42 percent oppose).
More Key Findings
â€¢ Economy Remains Top Issue
In contrast, most likely voters approve of the job their two U.S. Senators are doing (Feinstein 55 percent, Boxer 50 percent). While 55 percent of likely voters disapprove of the performance of the U.S. Congress, 57 percent believe their own House representative is doing a good job. Nevertheless, 74 percent of likely voters have little or no confidence in the federal government to do what is right and 69 percent believe it wastes a lot of tax dollars.
Findings are based on a telephone survey of 2,003 California adult residents interviewed between Oct. 16 and Oct. 23. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. The sampling error for the total sample is +/- 2 percent.
PPIC is a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to improving public policy through objective, nonpartisan research on the economic, social, and political issues that affect Californians. The institute was established in 1994 with an endowment from William R. Hewlett.
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)